Comparative study on the cost effectiveness of Vitamin A Supplementation in 3 countries (consultancy) 342 views1 applications


Background

Vitamin A supplementation (VAS) for children under five years of age has been a cornerstone of global child survival programs for decades, and VAS has been shown to have positive impacts on reducing child mortality. The World Health Organization recommends all children 6-59 months receive high-dose VAS every 4 to 6 months in areas where the prevalence of vitamin A deficiency is ≥ 20% in young children, and more than 80 countries currently have universal VAS programs in place. In SSA, VAS has mainly been provided through National Immunization Days (NID) and polio Supplemental Immunization Activities. As these involve providing essential childhood vaccines through door-to-door delivery, coverage has generally been high (> 80%) for both immunizations and VAS,[v] compared to the much lower coverage typically achieved through health facility-based delivery. More recently, semiannual Child Health Days or Child Health Weeks (CHWs), which utilize a fixed-site community-based approach rather than household visits, have become a key delivery platform for VAS in SSA. However, funding constraints and successful polio eradication efforts are shifting the policy and program focus away from NIDs and CHDs to integration of VAS into routine immunization services. Two examples of this are the six-month and six-monthly contact points, which enable year-round supplementation and allow for adding-on of additional health services (e.g., family planning counselling) when a parent brings their child to a health facility. Additional approaches are also being tested, such as the use of community-health workers to facilitate campaigns.

The restructuring of vitamin A delivery presents challenges in terms of identifying ways to sustain high coverage while also lowering costs. However, there is limited detailed data available on the costs (or cost-effectiveness) of different models of VAS in different contexts – with some notable exceptions, particularly for the case of Cameroon. A 2007 cross-country analysis found costs to vary widely across contexts. As such, this study seeks to evaluate the costs (overall and per child reached) of three different approaches to VAS: mixed approach in Kenya, door to door in Burkina Faso and routine approach in Mozambique.

Research Objectives: The study in question aims to compare the costs of these three strategies for the delivery of VAS. The results can be analyzed in combination with percentages and number of children reached (as determined through post-event coverage surveys (PECS) and administrative data, respectively), to connect costs to impact.

Methods: The study is designed as a comparative study among three distribution models:

(1) Kenya: A routine strategy that combines routine facility-based delivery of VAS with outreach sessions organized in early child development centers and catch up events twice a year. Services delivered include vitamin A supplements to children 6-59 months (100,000 IU capsules for children 6-11 months and 200,000 IU capsules for children 12-59 months) and deworming tablets (Albendazole) for children 12-59 months. Services are distributed by teams consisting of facility health personnel and community workers.

(2) Burkina Faso: a newly designed campaign approach called Vitamin A Days Plus (JVA+). This campaign is organized using two different delivery models: in urban settings, teams of health workers and community workers deliver services over a five-day period using a door-to-door approach. In rural areas, CHWs paid by the government of Burkina Faso are given up to five weeks to distribute the services in their catchment area (the number of households each community worker covers varies widely between areas). Services delivered are vitamin A supplements to children 6-59 months (100,000 IU capsules for children 6-11 months and 200,000 IU capsules for children 12-59 months), deworming tablets (Albendazole) for children 12-59 months and measurement of mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) using an insertion tape to screen for child wasting. The urban approach is thus quite similar to that used in Mali.

(3) Mozambique: Routine delivery of VAS is organized at facility level and through outreach sessions supported by community workers. In this case, the study will compare two support programs to identify how much support is needed by the health system to reach high coverage and how much each support system costs. Services delivered include VAS to children aged 6-59 months (100,000 IU capsules for children 6-11 months and 200,000 IU capsules for children 12-59 months) and deworming tablets (Albendazole) for children 12-59 months. Services are delivered by health personnel and CHWs.

All approaches are implemented nationwide by the respective Ministry of Health, with support from HKI in certain areas. For the purposes of costing analysis, urban and rural areas will likely need to be analyzed separately; if feasible, analysis might be done at a finer sub-national level, as well (i.e., the region). All costs associated with the distribution (e.g., planning, awareness-raising, delivery, supervision and monitoring) will be taken into account; results will be reported at the overall cost level as well broken down by cost type (e.g., fixed v. variable; actual v. opportunity; personnel, planning, monitoring, etc.)

HKI currently supports VAS projects in 11 African countries, with expected expansion into additional countries in the coming year. In campaign-based countries, this entails at least two campaigns a year, and HKI expects to continue this work for several years. Though we have not reported on cost per unit impact in the past, we plan to do this on a regular basis in the future. It is thus essential to create standard processes, budget codes, templates, and other reporting tools to facilitate ongoing collection of cost data by HKI staff (technical and financial) and to build the capacity for analysis of this data among select technical staff, including the creation of standard analysis code files, templates, etc. Having comparable cost data across time will permit additional analyses of relative costs of different models and types of support as well as change in cost over time.

The Role of the Costing Analyst

To support this work, HKI is seeking a consultant to act as Costing Analyst to undertake three main areas of work:

(1) Support the review and adaptation of existing tools developed for the study.

(2) Support and participate in selected activities associated with costing data collection, analysis, and reporting.

(3) As an integral part of (1 and 2), help HKI to develop the tools and technical capacity to independently undertake additional costing analysis of VAS approaches in the future.

The Costing Analyst consultant will work with a consultant Costing Analysis Advisor (CAA) and members of the HKI staff to undertake all of this work.

Specific Responsibilities

· Adapt existing tools and protocols for countries

· Work with the project team to decide on key choices that relate to the CEA analysis (e.g., specific methods for determining the inclusion of costs, how to deal with partners’ costs, etc.)

· Review existing financial reporting structures (e.g., expense coding) to ensure that the necessary information is collected by the HKI team

· Determine needs for any additional collection of (population or service provider) data via coverage surveys and reporting from partners

· Periodically review the costing data with HKI to ensure appropriate collection and labelling

· Develop a database of relevant costing data, as needed for the analysis

· Undertake costing analysis, in line with the appropriate rigorous methodologies, and align this to coverage / impact data to report on costs per unit of impact

· Train select HKI staff in how to analyze costing data

· Draft a brief report on the costing analysis method and findings, to be included in the project report

· Lead the writing (with HKI staff) of at least one paper reporting on the costing analysis results

As part of this work, it is anticipated that there will be at least one workshop, with the CA and HKI staff. This will focus on the design of the methodology and training of relevant staff on use of reporting tools; a second, smaller workshop may be organized for discussion and training on analytic approaches.

Qualifications required

· Hold at least a MSc in a relevant field (e.g., public health, nutrition, and / or health economics)

· Demonstrated experience in advanced statistical analysis and research

· Demonstrated experience of working with public health programs, with a preference for nutrition programs

· Experience or interest in costing analysis for health services

· Demonstrated experience in writing peer-reviewed publications

Expected time: 63 days

How to apply:

To apply, send a cv and a cover letter indicating your period of availability and daily fee at [email protected] before 20 September 2019, indicating the title of the consultancy as a subject.

More Information

  • Job City Burkina Faso, Kenya, Mozambique
  • This job has expired!
Share this job


Helen Keller International (HKI) combats the causes and consequences of blindness and malnutrition by establishing programs based on evidence and research in vision, health and nutrition. Founded in 1915 by Helen Keller and George A. Kessler, the organization’s mission is to save the sight and lives of the most vulnerable and disadvantaged.

George A. Kessler, also known as the "Champagne King," was a passenger on the RMS Lusitania in 1915 when it was torpedoed by a German U-boat. When he was fighting for his life in the cold waters of the Atlantic off the coast of Ireland, he vowed that if he survived, he would devote much of his time and substantial financial resources to a worthwhile cause. The cause he chose was assisting Allied soldiers blinded in the service. He later befriended Helen Keller and helped found the organization that became Helen Keller International.HKI’s two major areas of expertise are Eye Health and Nutrition. Its Eye Health programs address the major causes of blindness in the world, including cataract, trachoma and onchocerciasis, and treating refractive error. Its nutrition programs include vitamin A, iron/folate, and multi-micronutrient supplementation, fortification of commonly used foods, dietary diversification, community- and school-gardening as well as school health activities, the promotion of breastfeeding and complementary feeding, and nutritional surveillance to provide critical data to governments and other development partners. Each year, HKI's programs benefit millions of people.Currently, HKI works in 22 countries around the world in Africa, Asia and the United States. Global headquarters are located in New York City, and programs are also developed and administered through regional offices, currently located in Senegal and Phnom Penh, as well as through 19 country offices and an additional development office in Paris. HKI has country offices in Burkina Faso, Bangladesh, Cameroon, Cambodia, Côte d’Ivoire, China, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea, Indonesia, Mali, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nepal, Niger, Nigeria, Philippines, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, Vietnam, and Zimbabwe.
Connect with us
0 USD Burkina Faso, Kenya, Mozambique CF 3201 Abc road Consultancy , 40 hours per week Helen Keller International (HKI)

Background

Vitamin A supplementation (VAS) for children under five years of age has been a cornerstone of global child survival programs for decades, and VAS has been shown to have positive impacts on reducing child mortality. The World Health Organization recommends all children 6-59 months receive high-dose VAS every 4 to 6 months in areas where the prevalence of vitamin A deficiency is ≥ 20% in young children, and more than 80 countries currently have universal VAS programs in place. In SSA, VAS has mainly been provided through National Immunization Days (NID) and polio Supplemental Immunization Activities. As these involve providing essential childhood vaccines through door-to-door delivery, coverage has generally been high (> 80%) for both immunizations and VAS,[v] compared to the much lower coverage typically achieved through health facility-based delivery. More recently, semiannual Child Health Days or Child Health Weeks (CHWs), which utilize a fixed-site community-based approach rather than household visits, have become a key delivery platform for VAS in SSA. However, funding constraints and successful polio eradication efforts are shifting the policy and program focus away from NIDs and CHDs to integration of VAS into routine immunization services. Two examples of this are the six-month and six-monthly contact points, which enable year-round supplementation and allow for adding-on of additional health services (e.g., family planning counselling) when a parent brings their child to a health facility. Additional approaches are also being tested, such as the use of community-health workers to facilitate campaigns.

The restructuring of vitamin A delivery presents challenges in terms of identifying ways to sustain high coverage while also lowering costs. However, there is limited detailed data available on the costs (or cost-effectiveness) of different models of VAS in different contexts – with some notable exceptions, particularly for the case of Cameroon. A 2007 cross-country analysis found costs to vary widely across contexts. As such, this study seeks to evaluate the costs (overall and per child reached) of three different approaches to VAS: mixed approach in Kenya, door to door in Burkina Faso and routine approach in Mozambique.

Research Objectives: The study in question aims to compare the costs of these three strategies for the delivery of VAS. The results can be analyzed in combination with percentages and number of children reached (as determined through post-event coverage surveys (PECS) and administrative data, respectively), to connect costs to impact.

Methods: The study is designed as a comparative study among three distribution models:

(1) Kenya: A routine strategy that combines routine facility-based delivery of VAS with outreach sessions organized in early child development centers and catch up events twice a year. Services delivered include vitamin A supplements to children 6-59 months (100,000 IU capsules for children 6-11 months and 200,000 IU capsules for children 12-59 months) and deworming tablets (Albendazole) for children 12-59 months. Services are distributed by teams consisting of facility health personnel and community workers.

(2) Burkina Faso: a newly designed campaign approach called Vitamin A Days Plus (JVA+). This campaign is organized using two different delivery models: in urban settings, teams of health workers and community workers deliver services over a five-day period using a door-to-door approach. In rural areas, CHWs paid by the government of Burkina Faso are given up to five weeks to distribute the services in their catchment area (the number of households each community worker covers varies widely between areas). Services delivered are vitamin A supplements to children 6-59 months (100,000 IU capsules for children 6-11 months and 200,000 IU capsules for children 12-59 months), deworming tablets (Albendazole) for children 12-59 months and measurement of mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) using an insertion tape to screen for child wasting. The urban approach is thus quite similar to that used in Mali.

(3) Mozambique: Routine delivery of VAS is organized at facility level and through outreach sessions supported by community workers. In this case, the study will compare two support programs to identify how much support is needed by the health system to reach high coverage and how much each support system costs. Services delivered include VAS to children aged 6-59 months (100,000 IU capsules for children 6-11 months and 200,000 IU capsules for children 12-59 months) and deworming tablets (Albendazole) for children 12-59 months. Services are delivered by health personnel and CHWs.

All approaches are implemented nationwide by the respective Ministry of Health, with support from HKI in certain areas. For the purposes of costing analysis, urban and rural areas will likely need to be analyzed separately; if feasible, analysis might be done at a finer sub-national level, as well (i.e., the region). All costs associated with the distribution (e.g., planning, awareness-raising, delivery, supervision and monitoring) will be taken into account; results will be reported at the overall cost level as well broken down by cost type (e.g., fixed v. variable; actual v. opportunity; personnel, planning, monitoring, etc.)

HKI currently supports VAS projects in 11 African countries, with expected expansion into additional countries in the coming year. In campaign-based countries, this entails at least two campaigns a year, and HKI expects to continue this work for several years. Though we have not reported on cost per unit impact in the past, we plan to do this on a regular basis in the future. It is thus essential to create standard processes, budget codes, templates, and other reporting tools to facilitate ongoing collection of cost data by HKI staff (technical and financial) and to build the capacity for analysis of this data among select technical staff, including the creation of standard analysis code files, templates, etc. Having comparable cost data across time will permit additional analyses of relative costs of different models and types of support as well as change in cost over time.

The Role of the Costing Analyst

To support this work, HKI is seeking a consultant to act as Costing Analyst to undertake three main areas of work:

(1) Support the review and adaptation of existing tools developed for the study.

(2) Support and participate in selected activities associated with costing data collection, analysis, and reporting.

(3) As an integral part of (1 and 2), help HKI to develop the tools and technical capacity to independently undertake additional costing analysis of VAS approaches in the future.

The Costing Analyst consultant will work with a consultant Costing Analysis Advisor (CAA) and members of the HKI staff to undertake all of this work.

Specific Responsibilities

· Adapt existing tools and protocols for countries

· Work with the project team to decide on key choices that relate to the CEA analysis (e.g., specific methods for determining the inclusion of costs, how to deal with partners’ costs, etc.)

· Review existing financial reporting structures (e.g., expense coding) to ensure that the necessary information is collected by the HKI team

· Determine needs for any additional collection of (population or service provider) data via coverage surveys and reporting from partners

· Periodically review the costing data with HKI to ensure appropriate collection and labelling

· Develop a database of relevant costing data, as needed for the analysis

· Undertake costing analysis, in line with the appropriate rigorous methodologies, and align this to coverage / impact data to report on costs per unit of impact

· Train select HKI staff in how to analyze costing data

· Draft a brief report on the costing analysis method and findings, to be included in the project report

· Lead the writing (with HKI staff) of at least one paper reporting on the costing analysis results

As part of this work, it is anticipated that there will be at least one workshop, with the CA and HKI staff. This will focus on the design of the methodology and training of relevant staff on use of reporting tools; a second, smaller workshop may be organized for discussion and training on analytic approaches.

Qualifications required

· Hold at least a MSc in a relevant field (e.g., public health, nutrition, and / or health economics)

· Demonstrated experience in advanced statistical analysis and research

· Demonstrated experience of working with public health programs, with a preference for nutrition programs

· Experience or interest in costing analysis for health services

· Demonstrated experience in writing peer-reviewed publications

Expected time: 63 days

How to apply:

To apply, send a cv and a cover letter indicating your period of availability and daily fee at [email protected] before 20 September 2019, indicating the title of the consultancy as a subject.

2019-09-21

NGO Jobs in Africa | NGO Jobs

Ngojobsinafrica.com is Africa’s largest Job site that focuses only on Non-Government Organization job Opportunities across Africa. We publish latest jobs and career information for Africans who intends to build a career in the NGO Sector. We ensure that we provide you with all Non-governmental Jobs in Africa on a consistent basis. We aggregate all NGO Jobs in Africa and ensure authenticity of all jobs available on our site. We are your one stop site for all NGO Jobs in Africa. Stay with us for authenticity & consistency.

Stay up to date

Subscribe for email updates

March 2024
MTWTFSS
« Jan  
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
RSS Feed by country: