Final Evaluation for “Improving the Economic Status of Rural Low Income Youth in Upper Egypt” Project 154 views0 applications


Positive Planet International

Positive Planet International (PPI) is a non-profit organisation with a mission to help men and women across the world to create the conditions for a better life for future generations. Positive Planet was created out of the growth and transformation of PlaNet Finance, which had a mandate to fight poverty through the development of an inclusive financial sector through microfinance. Having developed our experience in microfinance, which remains an important component of our activities, Positive Planet has expanded to also run projects centred on entrepreneurship, financial education and value chains. The headquarters of Positive Planet are in Paris, France. We have developed activities in more than 50 countries, and manage them through local platform organisations in Africa, the Middle East and Europe. For more information, visit www.positiveplanet.ngo.

Project Overview

Poverty is one of the key problems which communities in Egypt face. One of the leading causes of poverty is the limited employment and income opportunities. Vulnerable youths in Sohag and Assiut graduating from the formal education system have limited relevant skills and knowledge that qualify them for finding decent jobs within these areas, or for establishing small businesses. For this reason, PPI is implementing a project named “Improving the Economic Status of Rural Low income Youth in Upper Egypt’ and a portfolio of projects that target youths.

The project has the following objectives:

  • To contribute to the economic development of rural low-income and unemployed youth through the provision of financial and non-financial services.
  • To develop the capacity of the partner MFI in order to provide access to adapted financial services and financial education to its beneficiaries.

The project targets youths within the age bracket of 21 – 40 year olds (50% are women) whose income is below 2US$ per day and whom reside in eight villages of Sohag and Assiut governorates in Upper Egypt.

Description of Action

Title of the action:

Improving the Economic Status of Rural Low income Youth in Upper Egypt

Location(s) of the action:

Middle East and North Africa, Egypt, Upper Egypt, Governorates of Sohag and Assiut

Total duration of the action:

30 months

Objectives of the action

Young, low income entrepreneurs and unemployed in rural Upper Egypt (eight villages in Sohag and Assiut) have their financial and non-financial needs met by MFIs, through a better geographical coverage and an improved and diversified offer of services, and have their ability to start, sustain and expand their Income Generating Activities improved.

Target group(s)

* 600 low-income rural youths (men and women, age bracket 21 – 40, income below 2$ per day, owners of existing microenterprises and unemployed) – living in eight villages of Sohag and Assiut governorates of in Upper Egypt (All 600 will receive financial education training, of which 360 existing entrepreneurs will have access to loans, and 40 of which new loan beneficiaries will be new business creators.)

* One NGO, the Association of Upper Egypt for Education and Development (AUEED) which will have its technical, institutional and operational capacities strengthened. 40 AUEED staff/loan officers of the two main branches in Sohag and Assiut which will increase their professional skills, tools and working methods.

Final beneficiaries

Financial services provided by the project will benefit 400 youth (360 existing entrepreneurs and 40 youth start-ups). This corresponds to a total of 2,000 persons representing family members of the low income rural youth (average family size is five);

Furthermore, the project will target additional 200 youth with financial education services supporting them in reinforcing and expanding their businesses.

Estimated results

R1. Financial and social performance of the partner-MFI is strengthened; R2. Adapted, high quality financial and non-financial services are accessible to rural low income young entrepreneurs; R3. Education and Training modules for low income young rural entrepreneurs are incorporated into the operation of the MFI and offered on an on-going basis.

Main activities

A1.1 Review and update of the strategic plan and develop its action plan with monitoring and evaluation (M&E) social/financial indicators;

A1.2 Upgrade MIS to integrate M&E indicators;

A2.1 Adapt loan product to meet target segment needs;

A2.2 Train microcredit staff on the new product processes and procedures;

A 2.3 Roll out and monitor the product progress;

A 3.1 Assess the financial education needs of the target segment;

A 3.2 Conduct training of trainers to the MFI’s staff on the identified financial education modules;

A3.3 Support and supervise the delivery of the training sessions to target segment.

Evaluation Specific Objectives

PPI seeks to contract a local consultancy firm or a team of local consultants (freelancers) to make an assessment, as systematic and objective as possible, of the above mentioned project, its design, implementation and results. The aim is to determine the relevance and fulfilment of objectives, developmental efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability.

The consultant should provide information that is credible and useful, enabling the incorporation of lessons learned into the decision-making process of both PPI, its partner organisation, and the EU as the project donor. Moreover, documentation of lessons learnt and recommendations will further help to redesign or replicate the program elsewhere where applicable.

Evaluation Methodology & Execution

The consultancy should be carried on the basis of a desk study and a field visit. The desk study should cover the following documents:

  • Project contractual documents and further amendments;
  • Documents produced throughout the project;
  • Any other relevant documentation.

Furthermore, the evaluation should be built on interviews with:

  • Beneficiaries as well as partner NGO;
  • Management at PPI level and Partner NGO level

The consultancy should adopt an evaluation methodology coherent with the participatory approach of the project. The consultant/s is expected to conduct a participatory evaluation providing for meaningful involvement by the project partner, its beneficiaries and other interested parties.

The evaluation should therefore focus not only on quantifiable results but also analyse processes and dynamics generated by the project, their scope (in terms of people and other actors involved) and their sustainability. This implies moving away from a mere technical approach in order to understand the context in which youth in Upper Egypt live, and to assess the support brought to them by this project.

The consultant is expected to conduct the evaluation in Egypt (Sohag and Assiut governorates). The mission will be divided into the following phases:

Phase 1: Preparation

  • Document review: the consultant will have access to the internal documents of YUE (logical framework, monitoring tools, activity reports, market research report)
  • Elaboration of the precise methodology and timeline to be followed
  • Selection of the sample of actors to interview based on unbiased and relevant criteria
  • Development of survey templates and guidelines for the interviews
  • Validation meeting on the methodology, the tools and the planning

Deliverables:

Inception report including the objectives of the mission, the methodology and tools designed by the Consultant

Phase 2: Data collection (secondary and primary sources)

  • Conduct in-depth interviews with key stakeholders, partners and beneficiaries
  • Conduct focus group discussions with beneficiaries
  • Conduct quantitative survey with representative sample of beneficiaries

Deliverables:

  • Focus group discussions synthesis (main findings and quotations)
  • Data collection report

Phase 3: Data Analysis and preparation of the deliverables

  • Analysing the data gathered
  • Drafting reports
  • Finalising the final evaluation report.

Deliverables:

  • Draft report for feedback from the Project Manager
  • Final report including an executive summary, beneficiary testimonies and a four-page case study for communication and capitalisation. Any other relevant information will be added into annexes.

Expected results of the evaluation – Methodology

Relevance

The extent to which the aid activity is suited to the priorities and policies of the target group, recipients and donor. In evaluating the relevance of a programme or a project, it is useful to consider the following questions:

  • To what extent are the objectives of the programme still valid?
  • Are the activities and outputs of the programme consistent with the overall goal and the attainment of its objectives?
  • Are the activities and outputs of the programme consistent with the intended impacts and effects?

Effectiveness

A measure of the extent to which an aid activity attains its objectives.

In evaluating the effectiveness of a programme or a project, it is useful to consider the following questions:

  • To what extent were the objectives achieved / are likely to be achieved?
  • What were the major factors influencing the achievement or non-achievement of the objectives?

Efficiency

Efficiency measures the outputs — qualitative and quantitative — in relation to the inputs. It is an economic term which signifies that the aid uses the least costly resources possible in order to achieve the desired results. This generally requires comparing alternative approaches to achieving the same outputs, to see whether the most efficient process has been adopted.

When evaluating the efficiency of a programme or a project, it is useful to consider the following questions:

  • Were activities cost-efficient?
  • Were objectives achieved on time?
  • Was the programme or project implemented in the most efficient way compared to alternatives?

Impact

The positive and negative changes produced by a development intervention, directly or indirectly, intended or unintended. This involves the main impacts and effects resulting from the activity on the local social, economic, environmental and other development indicators. The examination should be concerned with both intended and unintended results and must also include the positive and negative impact of external factors, such as changes in terms of trade and financial conditions.

When evaluating the impact of a programme or a project, it is useful to consider the following questions:

  • What has happened as a result of the programme or project?
  • What real difference has the activity made to the beneficiaries?
  • How many people have been affected?

Sustainability

Sustainability is concerned with measuring whether the benefits of an activity are likely to continue after donor funding has been withdrawn. Projects need to be environmentally as well as financially sustainable.

When evaluating the sustainability of a programme or a project, it is useful to consider the following questions:

  • To what extent did the benefits of a programme or project continue after donor funding ceased?
  • What were the major factors which influenced the achievement or non-achievement of sustainability of the programme or project?

Other Evaluation Dimensions

  • Matching needs: Did the project/activities meet relevant needs of the beneficiaries?
  • Internal coherence: Were the result indicators and their means of verification adequate? What possible adjustments would the consultants recommend?
  • Gender mainstreaming: To which extent did the project succeed in including a gender perspective?
  • Impact and spillover: Were there any unforeseen positive/negative effects of the activities? Any unintended impact of the project interventions?
  • Synergies: to which extent were synergies achieved with other activities?
  • Which unmet needs can be identified that would be relevant for PPI to look into in an eventual continuation of the project or in similar future projects?
  • Which lessons learned can be drawn and identified with the corresponding recommendations.

Budget

There is a fixed budget for this assignment. Payment will be made on the basis of the submitted work plan.

Deliverables

All deliverables are to be submitted to YUE Project Manager in English, electronically.

Deliverables include:

  • An inception report, to be submitted one week after the beginning of the evaluation, explaining the methodology, work programme and timetable for the evaluation.
  • A final report to be submitted at the end of the evaluation with a maximum of 30 pages excluding annexes as described above.

The final evaluation report will be structured as follows:

Executive summary

  1. Main section:
  1. Introduction:
  2. Project description
  3. Evaluation objectives and methodology
  4. Analysis of the findings according to the evaluation criteria
  5. Conclusions and recommendations
  6. Lessons learned
  7. Annexes:

a.ToR Evaluation, b. Names of the evaluators, c. Logical framework of the project, d.Map of the project area, e. List of actors consulted, f. Literature and documentation consulted, g. Other technical annexes

Qualifications

  1. For the team leader

Education: Masters in Social science, Development studies, Economics, International Development, and related areas or equivalent.

Work experience:

  • Minimum 5 years experience in managing evaluations, project management or related fields.
  • Expertise in External evaluations especially for EU financed projects, Youth, Entrepreneurship, and/or Microfinance in Egypt and the Middle East region.
  • Documented extensive experience on similar evaluations of development projects in the field of microfinance and youth economic empowerment in Egypt.
  • Extensive experience in conducting external evaluations in the context of cooperation for development and a proven record delivering professional results.
  • Sound knowledge of evaluation and data-collection methods.
  • Native Arabic Speaker with exceptional English communication skills both written and verbal.
  • Solid process management skills, such as facilitation skills.
  • Ability to work independently and to the team in the field.
  • Understanding of Upper Egypt context and an ability to cope in a way that gets the deliverables done.
  • For the team members
  • University degree in Economics, Business, International development, Finance, Social or Human sciences or equivalent experience in evaluation missions.
  • Minimum 3 years of experience on monitoring and evaluation activities
  • High knowledge and understanding of the European Union external evaluation methodology
  • Previous experience evaluating Youth, Entrepreneurship or Microfinance projects.
  • Native Arabic Speaker with exceptional English communication skills both written and verbal.
  • Ability to work in a multi-partner project and multi-cultural environment

How to apply:

How to Apply

Interested candidates should send the following to [email protected] no later than 31st of March with “PPI Final Evaluation Consultancy” in the subject line.

  1. Technical Offer that contains:
  2. A motivation letter (maximum of 3 pages) indicating the consultants’ suitability for the assignment and the match with previous work experience and qualifications.
  3. A summary of how the team will be composed and the division of work between team members.
  4. A brief on the technical approach that will be used.
  5. Professional profile of the evaluation team/ company and CVs of all individuals included in the consultancy team.
  6. Financial offer that includes
  7. Consultant Daily Rate
  8. Budget break down for associated expenses (travel, accommodation, meals, transportation within governorates, printing, stationary,….etc) as these costs will be covered by the consultant as part of his/her payment.

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Only short-listed candidates will be contacted.
  • Applications received after the closing date will not be considered.
  • Applicants must submit the above-mentioned required info (6 points) as application with any missing item will not be considered.

More Information

  • Job City Egypt
  • This job has expired!
0 USD Egypt CF 3201 Abc road Fixed Term , 40 hours per week Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO) Positive Planet InternationalPositive Planet International (PPI) is a non-profit organisation with a mission to help men and women across the world to create the conditions for a better life for future generations. Positive Planet was created out of the growth and transformation of PlaNet Finance, which had a mandate to fight poverty through the development of an inclusive financial sector through microfinance. Having developed our experience in microfinance, which remains an important component of our activities, Positive Planet has expanded to also run projects centred on entrepreneurship, financial education and value chains. The headquarters of Positive Planet are in Paris, France. We have developed activities in more than 50 countries, and manage them through local platform organisations in Africa, the Middle East and Europe. For more information, visit www.positiveplanet.ngo.Project OverviewPoverty is one of the key problems which communities in Egypt face. One of the leading causes of poverty is the limited employment and income opportunities. Vulnerable youths in Sohag and Assiut graduating from the formal education system have limited relevant skills and knowledge that qualify them for finding decent jobs within these areas, or for establishing small businesses. For this reason, PPI is implementing a project named “Improving the Economic Status of Rural Low income Youth in Upper Egypt’ and a portfolio of projects that target youths.The project has the following objectives:
  • To contribute to the economic development of rural low-income and unemployed youth through the provision of financial and non-financial services.
  • To develop the capacity of the partner MFI in order to provide access to adapted financial services and financial education to its beneficiaries.
The project targets youths within the age bracket of 21 – 40 year olds (50% are women) whose income is below 2US$ per day and whom reside in eight villages of Sohag and Assiut governorates in Upper Egypt.Description of ActionTitle of the action:Improving the Economic Status of Rural Low income Youth in Upper EgyptLocation(s) of the action:Middle East and North Africa, Egypt, Upper Egypt, Governorates of Sohag and AssiutTotal duration of the action:30 monthsObjectives of the actionYoung, low income entrepreneurs and unemployed in rural Upper Egypt (eight villages in Sohag and Assiut) have their financial and non-financial needs met by MFIs, through a better geographical coverage and an improved and diversified offer of services, and have their ability to start, sustain and expand their Income Generating Activities improved.Target group(s)* 600 low-income rural youths (men and women, age bracket 21 – 40, income below 2$ per day, owners of existing microenterprises and unemployed) – living in eight villages of Sohag and Assiut governorates of in Upper Egypt (All 600 will receive financial education training, of which 360 existing entrepreneurs will have access to loans, and 40 of which new loan beneficiaries will be new business creators.)* One NGO, the Association of Upper Egypt for Education and Development (AUEED) which will have its technical, institutional and operational capacities strengthened. 40 AUEED staff/loan officers of the two main branches in Sohag and Assiut which will increase their professional skills, tools and working methods.Final beneficiariesFinancial services provided by the project will benefit 400 youth (360 existing entrepreneurs and 40 youth start-ups). This corresponds to a total of 2,000 persons representing family members of the low income rural youth (average family size is five);Furthermore, the project will target additional 200 youth with financial education services supporting them in reinforcing and expanding their businesses.Estimated resultsR1. Financial and social performance of the partner-MFI is strengthened; R2. Adapted, high quality financial and non-financial services are accessible to rural low income young entrepreneurs; R3. Education and Training modules for low income young rural entrepreneurs are incorporated into the operation of the MFI and offered on an on-going basis.Main activitiesA1.1 Review and update of the strategic plan and develop its action plan with monitoring and evaluation (M&E) social/financial indicators;A1.2 Upgrade MIS to integrate M&E indicators;A2.1 Adapt loan product to meet target segment needs;A2.2 Train microcredit staff on the new product processes and procedures;A 2.3 Roll out and monitor the product progress;A 3.1 Assess the financial education needs of the target segment;A 3.2 Conduct training of trainers to the MFI’s staff on the identified financial education modules;A3.3 Support and supervise the delivery of the training sessions to target segment.Evaluation Specific ObjectivesPPI seeks to contract a local consultancy firm or a team of local consultants (freelancers) to make an assessment, as systematic and objective as possible, of the above mentioned project, its design, implementation and results. The aim is to determine the relevance and fulfilment of objectives, developmental efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability.The consultant should provide information that is credible and useful, enabling the incorporation of lessons learned into the decision-making process of both PPI, its partner organisation, and the EU as the project donor. Moreover, documentation of lessons learnt and recommendations will further help to redesign or replicate the program elsewhere where applicable.Evaluation Methodology & ExecutionThe consultancy should be carried on the basis of a desk study and a field visit. The desk study should cover the following documents:
  • Project contractual documents and further amendments;
  • Documents produced throughout the project;
  • Any other relevant documentation.
Furthermore, the evaluation should be built on interviews with:
  • Beneficiaries as well as partner NGO;
  • Management at PPI level and Partner NGO level
The consultancy should adopt an evaluation methodology coherent with the participatory approach of the project. The consultant/s is expected to conduct a participatory evaluation providing for meaningful involvement by the project partner, its beneficiaries and other interested parties.The evaluation should therefore focus not only on quantifiable results but also analyse processes and dynamics generated by the project, their scope (in terms of people and other actors involved) and their sustainability. This implies moving away from a mere technical approach in order to understand the context in which youth in Upper Egypt live, and to assess the support brought to them by this project.The consultant is expected to conduct the evaluation in Egypt (Sohag and Assiut governorates). The mission will be divided into the following phases:Phase 1: Preparation
  • Document review: the consultant will have access to the internal documents of YUE (logical framework, monitoring tools, activity reports, market research report)
  • Elaboration of the precise methodology and timeline to be followed
  • Selection of the sample of actors to interview based on unbiased and relevant criteria
  • Development of survey templates and guidelines for the interviews
  • Validation meeting on the methodology, the tools and the planning
Deliverables:Inception report including the objectives of the mission, the methodology and tools designed by the ConsultantPhase 2: Data collection (secondary and primary sources)
  • Conduct in-depth interviews with key stakeholders, partners and beneficiaries
  • Conduct focus group discussions with beneficiaries
  • Conduct quantitative survey with representative sample of beneficiaries
Deliverables:
  • Focus group discussions synthesis (main findings and quotations)
  • Data collection report
Phase 3: Data Analysis and preparation of the deliverables
  • Analysing the data gathered
  • Drafting reports
  • Finalising the final evaluation report.
Deliverables:
  • Draft report for feedback from the Project Manager
  • Final report including an executive summary, beneficiary testimonies and a four-page case study for communication and capitalisation. Any other relevant information will be added into annexes.
Expected results of the evaluation – MethodologyRelevanceThe extent to which the aid activity is suited to the priorities and policies of the target group, recipients and donor. In evaluating the relevance of a programme or a project, it is useful to consider the following questions:
  • To what extent are the objectives of the programme still valid?
  • Are the activities and outputs of the programme consistent with the overall goal and the attainment of its objectives?
  • Are the activities and outputs of the programme consistent with the intended impacts and effects?
EffectivenessA measure of the extent to which an aid activity attains its objectives.In evaluating the effectiveness of a programme or a project, it is useful to consider the following questions:
  • To what extent were the objectives achieved / are likely to be achieved?
  • What were the major factors influencing the achievement or non-achievement of the objectives?
EfficiencyEfficiency measures the outputs -- qualitative and quantitative -- in relation to the inputs. It is an economic term which signifies that the aid uses the least costly resources possible in order to achieve the desired results. This generally requires comparing alternative approaches to achieving the same outputs, to see whether the most efficient process has been adopted.When evaluating the efficiency of a programme or a project, it is useful to consider the following questions:
  • Were activities cost-efficient?
  • Were objectives achieved on time?
  • Was the programme or project implemented in the most efficient way compared to alternatives?
ImpactThe positive and negative changes produced by a development intervention, directly or indirectly, intended or unintended. This involves the main impacts and effects resulting from the activity on the local social, economic, environmental and other development indicators. The examination should be concerned with both intended and unintended results and must also include the positive and negative impact of external factors, such as changes in terms of trade and financial conditions.When evaluating the impact of a programme or a project, it is useful to consider the following questions:
  • What has happened as a result of the programme or project?
  • What real difference has the activity made to the beneficiaries?
  • How many people have been affected?
SustainabilitySustainability is concerned with measuring whether the benefits of an activity are likely to continue after donor funding has been withdrawn. Projects need to be environmentally as well as financially sustainable.When evaluating the sustainability of a programme or a project, it is useful to consider the following questions:
  • To what extent did the benefits of a programme or project continue after donor funding ceased?
  • What were the major factors which influenced the achievement or non-achievement of sustainability of the programme or project?
Other Evaluation Dimensions
  • Matching needs: Did the project/activities meet relevant needs of the beneficiaries?
  • Internal coherence: Were the result indicators and their means of verification adequate? What possible adjustments would the consultants recommend?
  • Gender mainstreaming: To which extent did the project succeed in including a gender perspective?
  • Impact and spillover: Were there any unforeseen positive/negative effects of the activities? Any unintended impact of the project interventions?
  • Synergies: to which extent were synergies achieved with other activities?
  • Which unmet needs can be identified that would be relevant for PPI to look into in an eventual continuation of the project or in similar future projects?
  • Which lessons learned can be drawn and identified with the corresponding recommendations.
BudgetThere is a fixed budget for this assignment. Payment will be made on the basis of the submitted work plan.DeliverablesAll deliverables are to be submitted to YUE Project Manager in English, electronically.Deliverables include:
  • An inception report, to be submitted one week after the beginning of the evaluation, explaining the methodology, work programme and timetable for the evaluation.
  • A final report to be submitted at the end of the evaluation with a maximum of 30 pages excluding annexes as described above.
The final evaluation report will be structured as follows:Executive summary
  1. Main section:
  1. Introduction:
  2. Project description
  3. Evaluation objectives and methodology
  4. Analysis of the findings according to the evaluation criteria
  5. Conclusions and recommendations
  6. Lessons learned
  7. Annexes:
a.ToR Evaluation, b. Names of the evaluators, c. Logical framework of the project, d.Map of the project area, e. List of actors consulted, f. Literature and documentation consulted, g. Other technical annexesQualifications
  1. For the team leader
Education: Masters in Social science, Development studies, Economics, International Development, and related areas or equivalent.Work experience:
  • Minimum 5 years experience in managing evaluations, project management or related fields.
  • Expertise in External evaluations especially for EU financed projects, Youth, Entrepreneurship, and/or Microfinance in Egypt and the Middle East region.
  • Documented extensive experience on similar evaluations of development projects in the field of microfinance and youth economic empowerment in Egypt.
  • Extensive experience in conducting external evaluations in the context of cooperation for development and a proven record delivering professional results.
  • Sound knowledge of evaluation and data-collection methods.
  • Native Arabic Speaker with exceptional English communication skills both written and verbal.
  • Solid process management skills, such as facilitation skills.
  • Ability to work independently and to the team in the field.
  • Understanding of Upper Egypt context and an ability to cope in a way that gets the deliverables done.
  • For the team members
  • University degree in Economics, Business, International development, Finance, Social or Human sciences or equivalent experience in evaluation missions.
  • Minimum 3 years of experience on monitoring and evaluation activities
  • High knowledge and understanding of the European Union external evaluation methodology
  • Previous experience evaluating Youth, Entrepreneurship or Microfinance projects.
  • Native Arabic Speaker with exceptional English communication skills both written and verbal.
  • Ability to work in a multi-partner project and multi-cultural environment
How to apply:How to ApplyInterested candidates should send the following to [email protected] no later than 31st of March with “PPI Final Evaluation Consultancy” in the subject line.
  1. Technical Offer that contains:
  2. A motivation letter (maximum of 3 pages) indicating the consultants’ suitability for the assignment and the match with previous work experience and qualifications.
  3. A summary of how the team will be composed and the division of work between team members.
  4. A brief on the technical approach that will be used.
  5. Professional profile of the evaluation team/ company and CVs of all individuals included in the consultancy team.
  6. Financial offer that includes
  7. Consultant Daily Rate
  8. Budget break down for associated expenses (travel, accommodation, meals, transportation within governorates, printing, stationary,….etc) as these costs will be covered by the consultant as part of his/her payment.
PLEASE NOTE:
  • Only short-listed candidates will be contacted.
  • Applications received after the closing date will not be considered.
  • Applicants must submit the above-mentioned required info (6 points) as application with any missing item will not be considered.
2018-04-01

NGO Jobs in Africa | NGO Jobs

Ngojobsinafrica.com is Africa’s largest Job site that focuses only on Non-Government Organization job Opportunities across Africa. We publish latest jobs and career information for Africans who intends to build a career in the NGO Sector. We ensure that we provide you with all Non-governmental Jobs in Africa on a consistent basis. We aggregate all NGO Jobs in Africa and ensure authenticity of all jobs available on our site. We are your one stop site for all NGO Jobs in Africa. Stay with us for authenticity & consistency.

Stay up to date

Subscribe for email updates

March 2024
MTWTFSS
« Jan  
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
RSS Feed by country: